Meta Platforms (META) — Deep Dive: Segments, Capex Scenarios & Valuation
Disclaimer: These reports include AI-generated summaries, often explicitly arguing one side as strongly as possible (positive or negative) and should not be relied on. They're designed to test theses and foster polite debate and scrutiny, so please comment if you see an error!
Date: March 30, 2026
Stock Price: ~$525.72 | Market Cap: ~$1.33T | EV: ~$1.33T
FY2025 Revenue: $201.0B (+22%) | FY2025 Net Income: $60.5B | EPS: $23.49
FY2025 FCF: $46.1B | FY2025 Capex: $72.2B | FY2026 Capex Guidance: $115-135B
Executive Summary
Meta is the most polarizing stock in mega-cap tech. On one hand, it operates the most profitable advertising business on Earth — Family of Apps generated $102.5B in operating income on 52% margins in 2025, growing 22% YoY, powered by 3.58 billion daily active people and an AI-driven ad engine (Advantage+) that handles $60B+ in annual ad spend. On the other hand, it is about to embark on the most aggressive capital expenditure cycle in the history of public technology companies: $115-135B in 2026 capex — nearly doubling 2025's already-massive $72B — with no cloud business to monetize excess capacity.
At $526, META trades at 17.4x forward P/E — the cheapest in the Mag 7. The consensus target is $838 (+59% upside), with 50 Buy ratings and zero Sells. Revenue growth is the highest among mega-cap peers at +27% expected for 2026. Yet the stock is down 34% from its August 2025 ATH of $796, and free cash flow is projected to compress toward zero in 2026 as capex absorbs nearly all operating cash flow.
The central question: Is the AI capex cycle a generational investment that will entrench Meta's advertising dominance and unlock new revenue streams (WhatsApp business messaging, Threads, AI agents)? Or is it another Zuckerberg empire-building exercise — the sequel to the $83.6B Reality Labs experiment — enabled by a dual-class structure that makes the CEO unaccountable to shareholders?
My view: The FoA business is extraordinary. On a standalone basis, it's worth $1.7-2.5T depending on the multiple — well above the current $1.33T market cap. The market is giving you the world's best advertising business at a meaningful discount because of legitimate fears about capex, Reality Labs, and governance. If you believe AI spending produces a return (and the early evidence from Advantage+, Reels monetization, and WhatsApp business messaging suggests it does), META is the cheapest high-quality growth stock in the market. If you believe the capex cycle is irrational and the ROI won't materialize, there are cheaper ways to lose money.
Section 1: The Business — What You're Actually Buying
Two Segments, One That Matters
Family of Apps (FoA) — 98.9% of Revenue
| Platform | Users | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 3.07B MAU / 2.11B DAU | Core social graph; feed advertising; Marketplace | |
| 3.0B MAU | Visual discovery; Reels; DM commerce; shopping | |
| 3.0B MAU | Messaging; business messaging; click-to-message ads | |
| Messenger | 942M MAU | Messaging; business tools |
| Threads | 400M MAU | Text-based social; ads launched globally Jan 2026 |
| Meta AI | 1B MAU | AI assistant across all surfaces |
Family Daily Active People (DAP): 3.58 billion (+7% YoY). To put this in perspective, roughly 45% of the world's population uses a Meta product every day.
FY2025 FoA Financials:
- Revenue: $198.8B (+22%)
- Operating Income: $102.5B
- Operating Margin: 51.6%
Reality Labs (RL) — 1.1% of Revenue
| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| Quest VR headsets | 1.7M units shipped in first 9 months of 2025 (-16% YoY); 74-84% of standalone VR market |
| Ray-Ban Meta glasses | 7M units sold in 2025 (tripled YoY); 73% smart glasses market share |
| Orion AR prototype | Consumer launch targeted 2027; manufacturing cost ~$10K/pair |
| Horizon Worlds | Being removed from Quest headsets June 2026; mobile-only version survives |
FY2025 RL Financials:
- Revenue: $2.21B
- Operating Loss: ($19.19B)
- Segment Margin: -869%
- Cumulative losses (2020-2025): $83.6B
What I like here: FoA is a machine. 52% operating margins on $199B of revenue is extraordinary. The user base is so large and so engaged that even modest improvements in monetization (higher ARPU, Reels, Threads, WhatsApp Business) produce billions in incremental revenue. The AI ad tools are working — Advantage+ campaigns show 14% lower cost per lead, and Meta's Andromeda ad-ranking system drove a combined 24% YoY ad revenue surge in Q4 2025 (18% impression growth + 6% price growth).
What concerns me: Reality Labs has burned $83.6B with minimal tangible return. The strategic pivot away from VR/metaverse toward AI/AR glasses is encouraging, but the losses are guided to continue at ~$19B/year in 2026. And the $115-135B capex guidance is staggering — it dwarfs Reality Labs as a capital allocation risk.
Section 2: The P&L — A Five-Year View
Historical Financial Trajectory
| Year | Revenue | Growth | Op Income | Op Margin | Net Income | EPS | FCF | Capex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $86.0B | +22% | $32.7B | 38% | $29.1B | $10.09 | $23.0B | $15.7B |
| 2021 | $117.9B | +37% | $46.8B | 40% | $39.4B | $13.77 | $39.1B | $18.6B |
| 2022 | $116.6B | -1% | $28.9B | 25% | $23.2B | $8.59 | $19.0B | $31.4B |
| 2023 | $134.9B | +16% | $46.8B | 35% | $39.1B | $14.87 | $43.9B | $27.3B |
| 2024 | $164.5B | +22% | $69.4B | 42% | $62.4B | $23.86 | $54.1B | $37.3B |
| 2025 | $201.0B | +22% | $83.3B | 41% | $60.5B | $23.49 | $46.1B | $72.2B |
Key observations:
- Revenue has nearly tripled from $86B (2020) to $201B (2025) — 18.5% CAGR.
- Operating margins recovered from the 2022 trough (25%) to 41% in 2024-2025 via the "Year of Efficiency" cost discipline.
- FY2025 was the first year where EPS declined (-2% YoY) despite 22% revenue growth, driven by higher taxes and surging capex-related costs.
- FCF peaked at $54.1B in FY2024 and has already begun compressing — $46.1B in FY2025, and 2026 will be much worse.
Reality Labs — The $83.6B Experiment
| Year | RL Revenue | RL Operating Loss | Cumulative Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $1.1B | ($6.6B) | ($6.6B) |
| 2021 | $2.3B | ($10.2B) | ($16.8B) |
| 2022 | $2.2B | ($13.7B) | ($30.5B) |
| 2023 | $1.9B | ($16.1B) | ($46.6B) |
| 2024 | $2.1B | ($17.7B) | ($64.4B) |
| 2025 | $2.2B | ($19.2B) | ($83.6B) |
This is the most expensive product development bet in corporate history. Horizon Worlds — the centerpiece of Zuckerberg's metaverse vision — is being effectively discontinued from VR headsets in June 2026. Quest headset sales are declining. The one bright spot is Ray-Ban Meta glasses (7M units, tripled YoY), which suggests the pivot to AI-powered smart glasses may eventually work — but "eventually" is doing a lot of heavy lifting at $19B/year in losses.
FoA Operating Income — The Hidden Giant
| Year | FoA Revenue | FoA Operating Income | FoA Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $115.7B | $56.9B | 49% |
| 2022 | $114.4B | $42.7B | 37% |
| 2023 | $133.0B | $62.9B | 47% |
| 2024 | $162.4B | $87.1B | 54% |
| 2025 | $198.8B | $102.5B | 52% |
If FoA were a standalone company, it would be the most profitable advertising business ever created — $102.5B in operating income on 52% margins. For context, Alphabet's total operating income in 2025 was approximately $110B across Search, YouTube, Cloud, and all other bets. FoA alone is nearly as profitable as all of Alphabet.
Section 3: The Capex Question — $115-135B in 2026
This is the most important number in the report.
Capex Trajectory
| Year | Capex (incl. leases) | % of Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $15.7B | 18% |
| 2021 | $18.6B | 16% |
| 2022 | $31.4B | 27% |
| 2023 | $27.3B | 20% |
| 2024 | $37.3B | 23% |
| 2025 | $72.2B | 36% |
| 2026E | $115-135B | 45-53% |
At the midpoint of guidance ($125B), Meta will spend more on capex in 2026 than the entire GDP of Kuwait. This is being directed at:
- AI data centers (including a $10B facility in Indiana)
- Over 1 million new GPU deployments
- Tens of gigawatts of power capacity
- Llama model training and inference infrastructure
- Meta has committed $600B in US infrastructure by 2028
Capex Intensity vs. Peers (2026 Projected)
| Company | 2026E Capex | 2025 Revenue | Capex/Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | $115-135B | $201B | 57-67% |
| Amazon | ~$200B | ~$638B | ~31% |
| Alphabet | ~$175-185B | ~$380B | ~46-49% |
| Microsoft | ~$120B+ | ~$262B | ~46%+ |
Meta has the highest capex intensity relative to revenue. The critical difference: Amazon, Microsoft, and Google all have cloud businesses that directly monetize AI infrastructure. Meta does not. Meta's AI ROI is indirect — it flows through better ad targeting, higher engagement, and eventually new products (AI agents, WhatsApp Business, etc.).
FCF Implications
| Year | OCF (est.) | Capex (est.) | FCF (est.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $91B | $37B | $54B |
| 2025 | $116B | $72B | $46B |
| 2026E | $120-130B | $115-135B | $0-15B |
FCF could approach zero in 2026. This is the market's primary concern and the reason the stock trades at a 17x forward P/E despite 27% revenue growth. If Meta were spending at 2024's capex intensity, FY2026 FCF would be ~$80-90B and the stock would likely be $700+.
Three Capex Scenarios and Their Valuation Implications
Scenario 1: AI Pays Off (Bull)
- Capex peaks in 2026-2027, then moderates to 30-35% of revenue by 2028
- AI drives sustainable 20%+ ad revenue growth
- FoA margins stabilize at 50%+
- FY2028 revenue: $340B, operating income: $130B+, FCF: $60-70B
- At 22x forward earnings: $800-900/share
Scenario 2: Capex Persists (Base)
- Capex stays elevated at 40-45% of revenue through 2028
- Revenue growth moderates to 15-18% as AI gains are offset by higher depreciation
- Operating margins compress to 35-37%
- FY2028 revenue: $310B, operating income: $110B, FCF: $30-40B
- At 20x forward earnings: $650-700/share
Scenario 3: AI Disappoints (Bear)
- Revenue growth slows to 10-12% (macro + China tariffs + AI underdelivery)
- Capex cuts come too late; depreciation crushes margins to 30-32%
- FY2028 revenue: $275B, operating income: $85B, FCF: $15-25B
- At 16x forward earnings: $400-450/share
Section 4: Long-Term Threats
1. AI Capex May Not Produce Returns
This is the existential risk. Meta is spending $115-135B in 2026 with no cloud business to monetize excess capacity. If AI-driven ad improvements plateau, if Llama models fail to maintain competitiveness against GPT and Gemini, or if the AI infrastructure cycle enters a bust (as prior tech investment cycles have), Meta will have overbuilt at massive cost. The comparison to 2022 is apt: Zuckerberg committed aggressively to the metaverse, the stock fell 64%, and he was forced into the "Year of Efficiency." The dual-class structure means there is no external check on this spending.
2. China Advertiser Dependency ($18.4B at Risk)
Chinese advertisers (Temu, Shein, and hundreds of smaller e-commerce players) accounted for 11% of Meta's 2025 revenue (~$18.4B). This is entirely composed of Chinese companies advertising to overseas consumers — Meta is banned in China. Tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145% in 2025, and the de minimis exemption was terminated May 2, 2025. Temu has already slashed US ad spending by 31% and Shein by 19%. MoffettNathanson estimated $7B of incremental ad revenue since 2023 is at risk from Chinese pullback. In a severe scenario, the impact could reach $23B.
3. Regulatory Avalanche
The regulatory picture is the most hostile in Meta's history:
- 2,172+ federal cases in the social media addiction MDL, plus hundreds in state courts
- $375M verdict (March 24, 2026, New Mexico) for facilitating child exploitation; more penalties possible
- EU DSA fines of up to 6% of global revenue (~$12B) pending
- FTC appeal of the monopoly ruling ongoing
- 20 US states with comprehensive privacy laws, creating a compliance patchwork
- KOSA (children's online safety) advancing through Congress
No single case is existential, but the cumulative financial and operational burden is significant and growing.
4. TikTok Sale Did Not Eliminate the Threat
TikTok's US sale closed in January 2026, but the platform remains fully operational under new American-led ownership. TikTok retains ~40% of short-form video engagement, with a "For You" algorithm that remains superior to Reels at content discovery (3.15% engagement rate vs. 0.65% for Reels). The ban scenario that would have gifted Meta billions in freed-up ad spend did not materialize.
5. ATT Signal Loss Is Permanent
75% of iOS users have opted out of tracking under Apple's App Tracking Transparency framework. This reduced trackable Apple traffic from 73% to 18%, permanently impairing Meta's ability to target and measure ads on iOS. Meta has adapted (Advantage+, Conversions API, first-party data modeling), but the pre-ATT precision is gone. Apple's expanding on-device AI (Apple Intelligence) could further reduce the data available to Meta.
6. Governance — Unchecked Power
Zuckerberg holds 61% of voting power through Class B shares. He cannot be removed as CEO. No shareholder proposal can pass without his consent. The board effectively serves at his pleasure. This structure enabled:
- $83.6B in Reality Labs losses with no accountability mechanism
- $115-135B in 2026 capex with no external check
- The content moderation rollbacks in January 2025 (ending fact-checking, loosening hate speech policies)
BlackRock and Vanguard have voted against the dual-class structure but are powerless. If the AI capex cycle fails to produce returns, shareholders have no recourse except selling.
Section 5: Valuation — With and Without Reality Labs
Consolidated Valuation (Current)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Stock Price | $525.72 |
| Market Cap | ~$1.33T |
| Trailing P/E | 22.4x |
| Forward P/E (2026E) | 17.4x |
| Forward P/E (2027E) | 15.1x |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1x |
| P/FCF (TTM) | 28.8x |
| P/S | 6.6x |
| PEG Ratio | 0.78-0.88 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% |
Peer Comparison
| Company | Forward P/E | Rev Growth (2026E) | FCF Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 17.4x | +27% | ~3.5% (TTM) |
| GOOG | 23.3x | +15-18% | ~4% |
| AMZN | 26.7-28.6x | +12-15% | ~2% |
| MSFT | 18.8x | +14-16% | ~3% |
| AAPL | 29.1-32.1x | +7-9% | ~3.5% |
META is the cheapest in the Mag 7 on forward P/E (17.4x) and has the highest revenue growth (+27%). The discount reflects capex risk and Reality Labs drag.
Family of Apps — Standalone Valuation
| Scenario | Multiple | FoA Operating Income | Implied FoA Value | Per Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 18x operating income | $102.5B | $1.85T | ~$720 |
| Base | 22x operating income | $102.5B | $2.26T | ~$880 |
| Bull | 25x operating income | $102.5B | $2.56T | ~$995 |
Even at the bear multiple (18x), FoA alone is worth $1.85T — 39% above the current market cap. This implies the market is assigning a massive negative value to Reality Labs and/or applying a significant discount for capex/governance risk.
Reality Labs — Negative Value Assessment
| Approach | Implied RL Value |
|---|---|
| Capitalized losses ($19B/year at 10% discount) | -$190B |
| Market cap minus bear FoA value ($1.33T - $1.85T) | -$520B |
| Market cap minus base FoA value ($1.33T - $2.26T) | -$930B |
The market is pricing in significantly more than just Reality Labs losses — the gap between FoA standalone value and META's market cap reflects a combined discount for:
- Reality Labs ongoing losses (~$19B/year)
- 2026 capex risk ($115-135B)
- FCF compression in 2026 (potentially near-zero)
- Governance discount (Zuckerberg's unchecked control)
- Regulatory and China advertiser risk
If Reality Labs Were Shut Down
- Immediate operating income boost: ~$19B/year
- After-tax EPS impact: ~$6-7/share
- At 20x incremental P/E: ~$120-140/share of value unlocked
- Combined with FoA base case: $950-1,100/share
This is not going to happen (Zuckerberg's control prevents it), but it illustrates the value destruction. Shutting down Reality Labs would add $120-140/share in value — a 23-27% uplift from the current price.
Section 6: Revenue Growth Drivers — The 5-Year View
FoA Revenue Building Blocks
| Driver | 2025 Revenue | 2028E Potential | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core feed/Stories ads | ~$140B | ~$170-180B | Mature; growth from pricing and Advantage+ |
| Reels | ~$50B ARR | ~$70-80B | Fastest-growing ad surface; video consumption +30% YoY |
| Click-to-message ads | ~$12B | ~$25-30B | US growth 50%+ YoY; WhatsApp + Messenger |
| WhatsApp Business messaging | ~$2B ARR | ~$10-15B | Wolfe Research sees $30-40B long-term potential |
| Threads | ~$0 (2025); ~$11.3B (2026E per Evercore) | ~$15-20B | 400M MAU; ads launched globally Jan 2026 |
| Meta AI / AI agents | Nascent | ~$5-10B | 1B MAU; monetization TBD |
| Total FoA | ~$199B | ~$300-340B |
Consensus Estimates
| Year | Revenue | EPS | Revenue Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 (actual) | $201.0B | $23.49 | +22% |
| 2026E | $255.2B | $30.19 | +27% |
| 2027E | $301.6B | $34.90 | +18% |
| 2028E | ~$340-350B (est.) | ~$40.84 | ~15% |
Share Count Trend (Buyback Tailwind)
| Year | Diluted Shares | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.888B | — |
| 2021 | 2.859B | -1.0% |
| 2022 | 2.702B | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 2.629B | -2.7% |
| 2024 | 2.614B | -0.6% |
| 2025 | 2.574B | -1.5% |
Meta bought back $44.6B of stock in 2025. At ~$525/share, that's ~85M shares/year or ~3.3% annual reduction. Buybacks contribute ~2-3pp to annual EPS growth on top of organic earnings growth. Total FY2025 capital return was ~$50B ($44.6B buybacks + $5.3B dividends).
Section 7: AI Monetization — The Evidence
This is where the bull case lives or dies. Is Meta's AI spending producing returns?
Evidence of ROI
| AI Initiative | Data Point |
|---|---|
| Advantage+ | Handles $60B+ in annual ad spend; lead-gen shows 14% lower cost per lead |
| Andromeda ad system | Drove 24% YoY ad revenue growth in Q4 2025 |
| GPU doubling for ad ranking | +3.5% Facebook CTR, +1% Instagram conversions, +3% overall conversions |
| Llama 4 ad creative | 8% improvement in ad quality scores |
| Video generation tools | $10B revenue run-rate by Q4 2025 |
| Meta AI chatbot | 1B MAU, 40M DAU — not yet monetized |
| Reels | ~$50B ARR, up from near-zero in 2022 |
Evidence of Concern
| Risk | Data Point |
|---|---|
| FCF compression | FCF fell 15% YoY in 2025 despite 22% revenue growth |
| No cloud business | Unlike AMZN/MSFT/GOOG, Meta can't sell excess AI capacity |
| Attribution is ambiguous | Hard to isolate how much revenue growth is "AI" vs. macro/pricing |
| Overbuilding risk | If AI models plateau or commoditize, Meta has no exit ramp |
| Capex/Revenue ratio | 57-67% in 2026 — highest among hyperscalers |
My read: The early evidence is genuinely positive. Advantage+ is a real product generating real advertiser ROI. Reels went from zero to $50B ARR in ~3 years, powered by AI recommendations. WhatsApp Business messaging is inflecting. But the 2026 capex step-up is enormous and front-loads costs while benefits accrue over years. The market is right to demand a capex discount — the question is whether 17x forward P/E is already a sufficient discount.
Section 8: Bull and Bear Cases
Bull Case (Target: $800-1,000)
-
FoA is the most undervalued advertising business on Earth. $102.5B operating income at 52% margins, growing 20%+, trading at ~13x FoA operating income. Any reasonable standalone multiple puts FoA alone at $1.8-2.5T.
-
AI spending is working. Advantage+, Andromeda, Reels recommendations, and AI-generated ad creative are driving measurable ROI. The capex cycle peaks in 2026-2027 and moderates by 2028, at which point operating leverage reasserts.
-
New revenue streams are inflecting. WhatsApp Business ($2B+ ARR, $30-40B long-term potential), Threads ($11B+ in 2026), click-to-message ads ($12B+, growing 50%+ in the US), and eventually Meta AI monetization.
-
Buybacks at $40-50B/year at depressed prices compound EPS growth. The 3%+ annual share reduction is a powerful tailwind.
-
Ray-Ban Meta glasses (7M units, tripled YoY) are the first hardware hit outside phones in a decade. If Artemis AR glasses (2027) succeed, Reality Labs becomes a real business.
-
Cheapest Mag 7 stock at 17.4x forward P/E with the highest revenue growth. PEG ratio of 0.78 screams undervaluation.
Bear Case (Target: $350-450)
-
$115-135B in capex with no cloud business. FCF approaches zero in 2026. If the AI cycle disappoints, Meta has massively overbuilt with no way to sell the capacity.
-
Reality Labs is a $19B/year bonfire controlled by a CEO who cannot be fired. Cumulative losses of $83.6B with no profitability timeline. Horizon Worlds is being shut down.
-
China advertiser dependency ($18.4B, 11% of revenue) is under acute pressure from tariffs. $7-23B of revenue at risk.
-
Regulatory tsunami: 2,172+ children's safety lawsuits, $375M verdict (March 2026), DSA fines up to $12B, FTC appeal, 20+ state privacy laws.
-
Governance: Zuckerberg's 61% voting control means shareholders are along for the ride. If the AI bet fails, there is no mechanism to force course correction — until the stock falls 60% again, as it did in 2022.
-
Margin compression inevitable. With $115-135B capex, depreciation will surge in 2026-2028, compressing operating margins from 41% to potentially 30-35%.
-
ATT signal loss is permanent. 75% iOS opt-out rate, Apple Intelligence expanding, and a permanently impaired measurement ecosystem.
Section 9: Analyst Consensus and Price Targets
Ratings (42 analysts)
| Rating | Count |
|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 20 |
| Buy | 18 |
| Hold | 4 |
| Sell | 0 |
| Consensus | Strong Buy |
Price Targets
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | $838 |
| Median | $850 |
| Low | $645 |
| High | $1,144 (Rosenblatt) |
| Implied Upside | +59% |
Most bearish estimates: UBS at $700, Cantor Fitzgerald at $676.
Section 10: User Metrics and Engagement
Family Daily Active People — 3.58 Billion
This is the single most important moat number. Meta reaches 45% of the world's population daily. User growth was +7% YoY despite Meta's products being banned in China and heavily restricted in Russia.
Revenue Per User — Still Expanding
| Year | Global ARPP (Annual) |
|---|---|
| 2022 | $39.63 |
| 2023 | $44.60 |
| 2024 | $49.65 |
| 2025 | $57.03 (+14.9% YoY) |
Regional ARPU (Approximate, Q4 2025):
- US/Canada: ~$90+
- Europe: ~$30-35
- Asia-Pacific: ~$7-8
- Rest of World: ~$5-6
The gap between US/Canada ARPU (~$90) and Rest of World (~$5) represents an enormous monetization runway. As digital ad markets mature in Asia-Pacific and Africa, ARPU convergence toward even $15-20 would represent tens of billions in incremental revenue.
Key Data Sources
- Meta Q4/FY2025 Earnings Release (PRNewswire)
- Meta Investor Relations
- Meta Q4 2025 Earnings Presentation (PDF)
- StockAnalysis — META Statistics
- StockAnalysis — META Forecast
- MacroTrends — META P/E History
- CNBC — Meta Q4 2025 Earnings
- CNBC — Reality Labs Q4 Loss
- Game Developer — $83.6B RL Losses
- DataCenterDynamics — 2026 Capex Guidance
- CNBC — Hyperscaler AI Spending
- MoffettNathanson — China Advertiser Risk (via TechStartups)
- NPR — FTC Ruling
- Al Jazeera — $375M Children's Safety Verdict
- Road to VR — 7M Ray-Ban Meta Glasses
- Business of Apps — ATT Opt-Out Rates
- Yahoo Finance — WhatsApp $30-40B Revenue Potential
- Evercore ISI — Threads $11.3B Revenue Estimate
- Vertu — AI Chatbot Market Share 2026